Consumer complaint regrading tatadocomo for Heavily Chraged for Incorrect Data usage
Complain ID : CCN022627 40
Aircel Complaint
Complaint Date: September 17, 2016
Modified date: September 17, 2016
- State : Maharashtra
- City : Pune
- Address: 201, Shree Nivas
Dear Team,
I have been using my tatadocomo number 9028385299 for more than a year.
I normal data usage is 1 to 2 GB per month, and my experience was good with the pricing so far.
But now, for the first time, incorrect data has been charge to me.
I had done a recharge of Rs. 359 and got 3GB data on 27th August with 28 days validity. My balance was Rs. 4000+
Till 11 Sep 2016 – I was in Pune and had more than 1 GB data (in Pune 3G works and I was using 3G data)
From 11 Sep to Sep 14 2016 – I was in Mumbai (where only 3G works and not 3G)
On Sep 15 2016 – My data balance is zero now, and balance reduced to Rs. 800+ from Rs. 4000+ - A big loss of more than 3000+ for in 3 days.
The pricing seems to be highly inaccurate and I need my money back which has been deduced so far in the last 3 days.
A complaint has been raised Ref No. PBR1238289, but the executives are not ready to admit that there is some glitch. Kindly investigate and do the justice.
Thanks & regards,
Ankesh Maheshwari
I have been using my tatadocomo number 9028385299 for more than a year.
I normal data usage is 1 to 2 GB per month, and my experience was good with the pricing so far.
But now, for the first time, incorrect data has been charge to me.
I had done a recharge of Rs. 359 and got 3GB data on 27th August with 28 days validity. My balance was Rs. 4000+
Till 11 Sep 2016 – I was in Pune and had more than 1 GB data (in Pune 3G works and I was using 3G data)
From 11 Sep to Sep 14 2016 – I was in Mumbai (where only 3G works and not 3G)
On Sep 15 2016 – My data balance is zero now, and balance reduced to Rs. 800+ from Rs. 4000+ - A big loss of more than 3000+ for in 3 days.
The pricing seems to be highly inaccurate and I need my money back which has been deduced so far in the last 3 days.
A complaint has been raised Ref No. PBR1238289, but the executives are not ready to admit that there is some glitch. Kindly investigate and do the justice.
Thanks & regards,
Ankesh Maheshwari
Related complaints
-
Complaint against INOX movies multiplex Charges over due on MRPShubham Patole / Aircel Complaint September 12, 2016 / Kalyan-Dombivali / MaharashtraAt the INOX movies multiplex charged one bottle of water 50RS. The MRP of water Bottle is 20RS. Water Bottle Detail : KINLEY- The coca-cola 1 LTR -
Complaint of food processsor against Bajaj Electricals Ltd from Vijay SalesNeelam R. Vasane / Aircel Complaint August 29, 2016 / Mumbai / MaharashtraI have purchased Bajaj food peocesssor Fx-13, sR. NO. V103111500479from Vijay Sales, Borivali west ON 24-04-2016 V.No. 106-BRO4-16SI 1588 . I have jus... -
Govt Medical College Akola Canteen selling cold drinks at more than MRPVirendra Jadhav / Aircel Complaint April 28, 2016 / Akola / MaharashtraWith reference to above subject. I want to compliant regarding extra charges above MRP taken from buyer for purchase of cold drink from Government Med... -
phone deactivation MTNL to reliance and submitted all the documents to Chembur officeVIVEK MISHRA / Aircel Complaint March 15, 2016 / Mumbai / MaharashtraDear Sir, I am a scientific officer working at BARC Mumbai. Under your new 599 plan I had opted for number portability from MTNL to reliance and submi... -
MSEDCL:Grievance about Electricity Meter Charge to meBharat M. Shah / Aircel Complaint March 15, 2016 / Navi Mumbai 400703 / MaharashtraMSEDCL, at its own will, changed about 16 meters, including my meter, in our building on 4/1/2016. On 23/2/16, lights started flickering in my residen... -
Niteo Furnitures Pvt. Ltd. (at Mahim, Mumbai) are cheatersArif Lala / Aircel Complaint February 24, 2016 / Mumbai / MaharashtraWe had booked Shoe Shelf (L5, white color) at Times Furniture, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai. Our Order No. 427 dt. 6th Dec, 2015. In spite of repeated...
Complaints
Service issue | Complaint | Query | Feedback | Suggestion | Reply