High average bill even after taking reading
Complain ID : CCN056906 103
Electricity Board Complaint
Complaint Date: March 7, 2022
- State : Maharashtra
- City : Nashik
- Address: AT POST: CHAS Tal Sinnar Dist Nashik
My consumer number is: 076260002151
Billing unit : 0477 : SINNAR-II (R) SUBDN
Meter was changed in September 2021. In September 2021 meter reading was 5 and after that OCT, NOV, DEC, JAN there was average reading of 68 units and bill amount 500/- I complained repeatedly on MSEB app but the complaint gets closed without any action. I stay in Pune and my mother only stays in my hometown. After visiting the MSEB office and requesting them to collect reading properly, FEB 2022 they collected the reading it was 154 units total and 149 units if we minus previous 5 units reading in September 2021. Now, for OCT, NOV, DEC & JAN meter reading was average 68 units and bills are paid so total 68+ 68 + 68 + 68 + 5 = 277 units bill is already paid and meter reading taken in FEB 2022 was itself 154 units. And bill generated for FEB 2022 is now 1170/- for 149 units in total and previous average reading is not reduced from the bill. This is complete fraud from MSEB and this is been happening every month. How can we pay such amount of incorrect bill?
Billing unit : 0477 : SINNAR-II (R) SUBDN
Meter was changed in September 2021. In September 2021 meter reading was 5 and after that OCT, NOV, DEC, JAN there was average reading of 68 units and bill amount 500/- I complained repeatedly on MSEB app but the complaint gets closed without any action. I stay in Pune and my mother only stays in my hometown. After visiting the MSEB office and requesting them to collect reading properly, FEB 2022 they collected the reading it was 154 units total and 149 units if we minus previous 5 units reading in September 2021. Now, for OCT, NOV, DEC & JAN meter reading was average 68 units and bills are paid so total 68+ 68 + 68 + 68 + 5 = 277 units bill is already paid and meter reading taken in FEB 2022 was itself 154 units. And bill generated for FEB 2022 is now 1170/- for 149 units in total and previous average reading is not reduced from the bill. This is complete fraud from MSEB and this is been happening every month. How can we pay such amount of incorrect bill?
Related complaints
-
Bill Paid But Still Not Recieved to MSEBArun Digambar Gaikwad / Electricity Board Complaint February 14, 2022 / Pune / MaharashtraAmount Deducted From bank But not Received to Electricity Board. please if possible Refund It... -
high bill amount ,sumit gaonkar / Electricity Board Complaint January 28, 2022 / KankavliKannad / Maharashtrai am living at kankavli sindhudurg district.in august i was change my temporarily meter to permanent meter .after that 1st month bill is nil then ,oct...
-
High Bills for 2 months- Dec and JanDaina Dsouza / Electricity Board Complaint January 20, 2022 / Mumbai / MaharashtraConsumer No-004966463673 We always got our bill worth for Rs.150-Rs.180 till Nov, bills were proper suddenly in month of Dec 2021 the bill went to Rs....
-
Electricity bill not updated paid via provided QR code on mahavitaran electricity billSushant Gaikwad / Electricity Board Complaint January 10, 2022 / Pune / MaharashtraI paid electricity bill via QR on the electricity bill but it didn't got updated on the portal it shows I haven't paid the bill it still still shows "...
-
We are facing falty electric meter issue regarding we want to change this faulty meterVishnu Kumar Singh / Electricity Board Complaint January 5, 2022 / Mumbai / MaharashtraHello , we are facing high amount of charge from continues 6 month the meter reading is faulty and the meter checker continue to put same readings bil...
-
Withought use of Electricity high bill issued by MSEB and removed meter.Somnath Gawali / Electricity Board Complaint December 31, 2021 / Palghar / MaharashtraI had paid all light bills of consumer No. 003014032621 (F. No. 101, Building No. 24, Color City, Boisar). My flat is not in use since one year so no ...
Complaints
Service issue | Complaint | Query | Feedback | Suggestion | Reply